Berikut ini merupakan pembahasan kunci jawaban Bahasa Inggris: Work in Progress untuk Kelas 10 halaman 114 Pembahasan
kali ini kita akan bahas Let’s Compare. yang ada pada buku paket Bahasa Inggris Halaman 114 Buku siswa untuk Semester 2 (Genap) Kelas X SMA/SMK/MA. Semoga dengan adanya pembahasan kunci jawaban Pilihan Ganda (PG) dan juga Essay Chapter 5 Graffiti ini,
kalian bisa menjadi lebih giat untuk belajar. Kunci jawaban ini
diperuntukkan untuk para pelajar yang sedang mengerjakan tugas Kurikulum Merdeka. Kunci Jawaban Let’s Compare. Hal 114 Bahasa Inggris: Work in Progress Kls 10
Kunci Jawaban Bahasa Inggris Kelas 10 Halaman 114 Let's Compare
C. Let’s Compare
Soal dan Jawaban
Compare Expository Text 1 and Expository Text 2 by completing the table.
1. What is the author claiming?
Answer:
2. What reasons does the author use to support the claim?
Answer:
Expository Text 1:
3. What evidence does the author include?
Answer:
Expository Text 1: Evidences the author include are:
4. What does the author say as the closing?
Answer:
Compare Expository Text 1 and Expository Text 2 by completing the table.
1. What is the author claiming?
Answer:
- Expository Text 1: The author claiming that graffiti is an art
- Expository Text 2: The author claiming that Graffiti is always vandalism
2. What reasons does the author use to support the claim?
Answer:
Expository Text 1:
- The reasons that the author uses to support the claim are First, graffiti enables the public to see something they may have never seen before. It connects them to the artist, and the artist gets to know that their work is loved and affects those who see it.
- Second, graffiti has the power to affect people positively. The people who create it are expressing themselves.
- The last reason why graffiti is an art is because of its uniqueness. Graiti can be made with many different materials, but its most common form is made by applying paint to a building’s wall.
- The reasons that the author uses to support the claim are First of all, graffiti is something that one celebrates, if one is juvenile enough to do so, when it shows up on someone else’s property but never on one’s own.
- Next, the question “When does graiti become art?” is meaningless. Graiti is always vandalism. By deinition, it is committed without permission on another person’s property, in an adolescent display of entitlement.
3. What evidence does the author include?
Answer:
Expository Text 1: Evidences the author include are:
- You can tell the quality of a person’s painting by the audience that they are drawing.
- Graffiti can be made with many different materials, but its most common form is made by applying paint to a building’s wall.
- Graffiti is made by someone utterly other than the artist, which means no two pieces are the same.
- Graffiti is a form of expression because it gives the reader or viewer the chance to see something different from their everyday life.
- Graffiti art is not meant to be understood by everyone, but everyone is meant to be appreciated.
- No institution that has celebrated graffiti in recent years — like the Museum of Contemporary Art in Los Angeles or the Museum of the City of New York — would allow its own premises to be defaced for even one minute.
- By definition, it is committed without permission on another person’s property, in an adolescent display of entitlement.
- Furthermore, John Lindsay, the progressive New York politician who served as mayor from 1966 to 1973, declared war on graiti in 1972.
- A 2008 study from the Netherlands has shown that physical disorder and vandalism have a contagious effect, conirming the “broken windows theory.”
4. What does the author say as the closing?
Answer:
- Expository Text 1: As part of the existing society, every person must strive to educate themselves of the origins of graiti and how it has evolved to this very day. A stock of knowledge doesn’t hurt; instead, it is a door that leads to understanding and more positivity.
- Expository Text 2: There is nothing “progressive” about allowing public amenities to be defaced by graffiti; anyone who can avoid a graiti-bombed park or commercial thoroughfare will do so, since tagging shows that an area is dominated by vandals who may be involved in other crimes as well.